More selections from
2008,
2009
and 2010. I was busy last fall and work that pays gets
priority over blogging.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query creepy. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query creepy. Sort by date Show all posts
Tuesday, October 16, 2012
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
The Chinatown Death Cloud Peril by Paul Malmont
Malmont, Paul. The Chinatown Death Cloud Peril. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2006.
There is trouble in Chinatown. The war god that sets faction against faction in Asia stretches a tentacle across the world to stir plots and revenge in America. Heroes rise to meet this menace, very unlikely heroes: writers.
Malmont takes real life writers of pulp magazines, who he clearly regards with great respect and affection, and puts fictional versions of them in the middle of the kind of adventure they may have written. Some of these writers were legends in their time, but may be little know today. For instance, the main characters are Walter Gibson, who wrote The Shadow as Maxwell Grant, and Lester Dent, who penned Doc Savage as Kenneth Robeson. Other names may be more familiar to modern readers of genre fiction, especially L. Ron Hubbard and Robert Heinlein. H. P. Lovecraft plays a brief but pivotal role in a creepy way suited to his weird tales. Several lesser know pulp writers play lesser roles in the story.
I enjoyed these intrusions of biography into the wild fiction. I don’t think anyone would need to be a fan of pulps to enjoy the book. If someone enjoys adventure stories, he’ll probably enjoy this one. The characters sometimes discuss what might be real, if improbable, and what is pulp, a good yarn. Malmont puts the pulp first.
Malmont achieves the right balance of fact and fiction by throwing out the balance. It’s fiction first. The reality is informative and fun, but Malmont makes it work double duty. It is biography and history, but it also helps the reader connect to the characters and their world, which does much to serve the fictional story.
The best thing about the book is that it is fun. It’s a thriller that thrills. It’s a twisty tale that doesn’t try to throw the reader, but sweep them along.
There is trouble in Chinatown. The war god that sets faction against faction in Asia stretches a tentacle across the world to stir plots and revenge in America. Heroes rise to meet this menace, very unlikely heroes: writers.
Malmont takes real life writers of pulp magazines, who he clearly regards with great respect and affection, and puts fictional versions of them in the middle of the kind of adventure they may have written. Some of these writers were legends in their time, but may be little know today. For instance, the main characters are Walter Gibson, who wrote The Shadow as Maxwell Grant, and Lester Dent, who penned Doc Savage as Kenneth Robeson. Other names may be more familiar to modern readers of genre fiction, especially L. Ron Hubbard and Robert Heinlein. H. P. Lovecraft plays a brief but pivotal role in a creepy way suited to his weird tales. Several lesser know pulp writers play lesser roles in the story.
I enjoyed these intrusions of biography into the wild fiction. I don’t think anyone would need to be a fan of pulps to enjoy the book. If someone enjoys adventure stories, he’ll probably enjoy this one. The characters sometimes discuss what might be real, if improbable, and what is pulp, a good yarn. Malmont puts the pulp first.
Malmont achieves the right balance of fact and fiction by throwing out the balance. It’s fiction first. The reality is informative and fun, but Malmont makes it work double duty. It is biography and history, but it also helps the reader connect to the characters and their world, which does much to serve the fictional story.
The best thing about the book is that it is fun. It’s a thriller that thrills. It’s a twisty tale that doesn’t try to throw the reader, but sweep them along.
Tuesday, November 20, 2012
Dickhead Roboticists
It appears that the fields of computer science
and robotics
attract a lot of Dickheads. By that I mean fans of science
fiction author Philip K.
Dick. Psychology
researcher David
F. Dufty is acquainted with a few of these fans, academics,
engineers,
and artists,
who undertook the strange challenge of building an android
simulacrum of their hero. He tells their
story in How to Build an Android.
Dick is possibly the best choice for an author to imitate in robotic
form. He is well known for his story Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?,
which was the basis of the movie
Blade Runner. The essence of the story is that robots have become
so sophisticated, intelligent,
and lifelike that it is almost impossible to distinguish them from real
humans. They blow away a Turing test, and
the latest models can only be identified through a test that detects their
carefully disguised lack of empathy; Dick
thought empathy was an essentially human trait that may not be copied by
computers. The hero of Do Androids Dream must track down and
destroy these nearly human machines.
Throughout this story and others, Dick explored identity and
the shrinking difference between human and machine. People suspect themselves to be androids,
androids are programmed to believe they are human, and both have false memories that
they cannot distinguish from reality. A
realistic android that interacted with people in conversation seemed like a
natural fit with Dick.
Of course, the project had practical implications. It required a lifelike interface. Artist and robot maker David Hanson
believes the face is a natural way for people to interact with each other and
potentially with technology. He has made a succession of realistic robotic
heads that can imitate human expression.
The PKD robot was backed by artificial
intelligence developed by researchers at the University
of Memphis, particularly Andrew Olney,
that allowed it to understand speech and construct responses based on things
Dick had said and written in life.
To top it off, something happened in the brief life of the android that
would have been well suited for one of Dick’s stories. They lost Dick’s head. Presumably it is still out there. It may be in some airline warehouse. It may be on the mantle of some thief, or
some flummoxed buyer of a lot of abandoned baggage. If someone has it, they haven’t been talking
about it.
The big question of the book is how do we interact with
technology? What will it look like in
the future? We will be increasingly able
to make machines that at least seem intelligent and look human. Hanson thinks that is the way to go. The Memphis scientists and engineers, and
many other like them, continue to work on interfaces capable of increasingly
sophisticated and seamless interactions with people. Are we on a trajectory from Siri to Jacosta to C-3PO to R. Daneel
Olivaw? Are androids just what we
need to make technology what we need or are they too creepy?
Dufty doesn’t pass judgment. The
PKD was an interesting piece of technology with and interesting history
that raises a lot of questions about what machines can be. Even as advance and capable as the PKD
android was, it had a lot of limitations.
It could carry on a conversation, in a quiet room with a patient
partner, but it did little else and its responses varied from the seemingly
real thing to nonsense.
Personally, I don’t think we need, nor do I want, computers with
faces. I would be pleased if I could get
my Windows 8 tiles to work. I do think
the way we interact with technology is important, especially that we are able
to get feedback and other information from technology in ways that helps us
understand what is going on and respond intelligently.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in
Dufty, David F. How to Build an Android: The True Story of Philip K. Dick’s Robotic
Resurrection. New York: Henry Holt, 2012.
Google
Sunday, April 12, 2015
The Picture of Dorian Gray by Oscar Wilde
Oscar
Wilde’s novel The Picture of Dorian
Gray is a classic of English literature.
I’m writing a review of it because I want some horror
to feature on Halloween.
Dorian Gray is, in my mind, a
weird tale. Wilde
produces a sense of creepiness that begins even in the seemingly light and
hopeful first chapter. The title portrait is a supernatural
object that horrifies and fascinates Gray. He is
preserved in youth
and beauty,
and possibly even saved from the consequences of evil deeds, but the
portrait become a mirror to his dark and sinful soul, something
that eventually becomes too horrible for him to endure.
In addition to being a weird tale, it is a moral tale. Gray
has beauty, wealth,
and status,
but he gives himself over to any kind of wickedness if their might be pleasure in it.
At first, it is the infatuation of a hollow love for the
actress Sibyl
Vane. When she disappoints him on the stage by failing to present an ideal
picture of love because acting it seems shallow compared to her real passion,
he rejects her. Her suicide nearly
turns him off the path he is pursuing, but when the thrill of the moment passed,
he nearly forgot her. The sins of youth and ignorance turn more willful as he
falls into using drugs
and prostitutes.
Eventually he murders
a man. The book hints at other wrongdoing, possibly homosexuality, affairs with
married
women,
seduction
for the sake of its own pleasure, gossip, excessive
drink, greed,
blasphemy and leading others into all
these things.
The book could be a social commentary
on the upper
class of his time. With all the advantages they had, they were still corrupt. A
fortunate life is not a sign of a good person. As with Job, poverty and
hardship are not indications of an evil life.
Some think Wilde is exploring own life in the book. One can read hints
of homosexuality in Basil Hallward’s
feelings toward Gray (Basil paints the portrait), and in Gray’s feelings toward
Lord
Henry Wotton. Possibly Wilde was critiquing his own aestheticism, finding
that it did not necessarily lead to a higher morality, but could as easily lead
one to an immoral, selfish, and consuming pleasure-seeking.
In the book, Wilde never comes out and says what his intentions are, if
he has any at all in terms of exploring himself, his society, or notions of
beauty, art and morality. It seems clear, though, the Wilde suggests a person
cannot be separated from his deeds and his consequences as Gray is with the aid
of his magical
painting. A man, his deeds, and their consequences may not be the same thing,
but they are linked in a powerful way. When Gray tries to destroy the painting
that bears the ugliness of his soul, he plunges the knife into his own heart.
Though some have accused Wilde of writing an immoral book, one could as
easily argue that he wrote a very moral book. Gray is sympathetic to a degree,
but he is an evildoer destroyed by the evil he did. The reader can contemplate
issues of art, beauty, and morality for himself. Along the way, he can enjoy a
creepy thrill.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in
Friday, December 21, 2012
STEM Books
I’ve reviewed 39 STEM-related
books (and counting). STEM is an acronym
for science,
technology,
engineering, and mathematics. As you may have seen in the news, there is a
push to improve STEM education,
interest students in STEM fields, and grow the number of workers
in these fields. The idea is that these
will be the skills needed by workers of the future. If you’re a STEM educator or a student
considering a career in STEM fields, you might like to take a look at some of
these books.
I’ll confess that I’m not an educator, but I think most of these books
will be accessible to high school and college students, and a few to middle
school students. The list is also a
reflection of my career and interests in engineering, public
health, policy,
and history. Even with these biases, I think it is a good
list for someone looking for STEM-related books.
I was fascinated by robots as a
kid. I enjoyed reading Isaac Asimov’s
robot stories. I longed for the Omnibot
2000 in the Sears Wishbook.
Robots have come a long way. In How to Build an Android, David F. Dufty
describes the short strange life of a very complex robot made to look and talk
like science
fiction author Philip K.
Dick. The robot had a very
sophisticated and lifelike head and complex artificial
intelligence. As with most complex
things, it was the work of many people who had to solve a lot of problems.
If you’re interested in robotics, this is an interesting nontechnical
book. In addition, you’ll get introduced
to some freaky sci-fi. You may even get
as (somewhat) legitimate reason to use the word “Dickhead” (capitalized, it
refers to a fan of PKD, so don’t go using it on anyone).
The Interstate
highway
system in the United States
is one of the most enormous structures built.
Some of the prospective STEM students who read this may actually be
younger than the Intestate system, though in some sense it is never complete
because it needs constant repair and maintenance. The Interstates were completed in the 1990s, but the Federal-Aid
Highways go back to 1916.
Earl
Swift wrote an accessible history of the Interstates in The Big Roads. If you interested in automobiles
or transportation,
it’s a good read.
Deborah
Cadbury describes seven wonders of engineering in Dreams of Iron and Steel. It covers almost a century of history, but
many of the events are concentrated in the Victorian Era. That was a time of great technological
innovation.
Though the book is history, many of the structures still stand. Railways, the Brooklyn
Bridge, the Suez
and Panama
Canals, and Hoover
Dam stand testament to an age of big engineering.
Though the memory of Professor Wragg’s sneer prompts me to not make
this confession, part of my interest in science and technology came from comic
books. Iron Man was
cool. Spider-Man’s
web shooters were very cool. Superhero
comics are full of fantasy,
admittedly, but the strange, unrealistic science and technology they depict
have inspired many to study STEM in reality.
Physicist John
Kakalios uses examples from comic books to explore real physics in The Physics of Supeheroes. Sometimes comics get there science
right. Even when they get it wrong, it
can be instructive. If you know what
people are talking about when they refer to the “New 52,” you may find this
book to be a great introduction to physics.
Here is another confession: I’m not especially interested in math. I endured a lot of math classes to study
engineering. Reading David
Acheson’s 1089 and All That did
not require such endurance. For one
reason, it is a short book. For another,
Acheson doesn’t expect his readers to be mathematicians; it is enough to follow
the outline of the math he discusses.
I recommend this book because so many people have a fear of math. 1089
can be followed by many high school students and older folks with math
phobias. Just take a deep breath, relax,
and follow along as well as you can.
You’ll see that math can be interesting, useful, and even beautiful in a
way.
Judith
St. George’s The Brooklyn Bridge is a short history of and iconic bridge. Written for the
bridge’s 100th anniversary, it is also the story of the engineers
who sacrificed life and health to see it completed: John Roebling and his son Washington. John Roebling was
a German immigrant who built many suspension
bridges and owed a wire-making business. He gave his son
and extraordinary education in bridge engineering for the time, and before
beginning work on the Brooklyn Bridge he served as an officer in the Union Army during the Civil War.
Why should a cutting-edge STEM student read about a
bridge that is almost 130 years old? It’s
because we still use and rely on very successful, centuries old technologies. Improving and rebuilding our infrastructure will be an important part of our economy. As recently as 2010, New York City and the federal government committed $500 million to
repair and repaint the Brooklyn Bridge.
STEM lumps together science, technology, engineering, and
mathematics. Is there a difference
between science and engineering? Is it
important?
Henry
Petroski, a professor of civil
engineering and history and author of The Essential Engineer, believes
there is an important difference. At
heart, science is about increasing knowledge. Engineering is about invention. Of course, new knowledge makes new invention
possible. Just as often, though,
engineering runs ahead of science.
Sometimes science didn’t advance until someone invented the instruments
to conduct new observations and experiments.
The invention of the microscope
made possible the science of microbiology. Steam engines
were built and greatly improved before we had a modern scientific understanding
of thermodynamics. In fact, thermodynamics was to a large extent
born out of desire to understand steam engines. In this sense, it is an
engineering science (study of manmade things) as much as a natural science
(study of natural things) or branch of physics.
Petroski’s focus in the book is the importance of engineering to
policymaking, where it is often overshadowed by science. Policy, science, and engineering play off of
each other a lot. Most of my career as
an engineer has been related to government, policy, and regulatory compliance.
The Ghost Map by science writer Steven
Johnson is the story of the birth of epidemiology. Epidemiology is a medical
science that uses statistics to
help us understand how diseases operate in a population. Using various statistical and geographic
tools, long before we had computers and GIS, physician
John Snow
demonstrated that cholera,
once a recurring plague
that wiped out hundreds of thousands of people in some outbreaks, was a waterborne
disease. This understanding,
initially met with much skepticism, allowed officials to intervene to prevent
the spread of the disease. For those who
say of their math classes, “I’ll never us this,” here is a case where math (and
science and policy) were used to make a great difference.
It is not much publicized today that the Lewis
and Clark
expedition of 1804
to 1806 had a
partly scientific mission. Captains
Lewis and Clark were charges with bringing back samples of the flora, fauna, and culture of the
western territories. It was also hoped
that they would find a water
passage to the Pacific Ocean. In Undaunted Courage, Stephen Ambrose
writes about the scientific mission as well as the policy, diplomacy, and
commercial
hopes the expedition carried.
Of course, what attracts most people to the Lewis and Clark expedition
is that it was a great adventure. There is a place in STEM fields for thoughtful
adventurers and explorers.
A list like this deserves something strange, creepy, and more fun than you care to
admit. Right now, thousands of very
young future STEM workers are catching bugs and snakes, breaking
their toys to see
what is inside, or staring into space with a weird expression
of vacancy and concentration.
Jan
Bondeson’s Buried Alive is not a
morbid book. It is sometimes humorous,
especially in consideration of topic.
From a STEM point of view, Bondeson shows how knowledge accumulates over
time. The fears and activities of our
forefathers may seem strange to us, but they sometimes made sense in light of
what they knew. Buried Alive doesn’t simply play off our fascination with the grotesque and death, though the
book might not have been written if we lacked that fascination, I think it
reminds us to approach our ancestors with a touch of grace and humility. Maybe our progeny will show us the same courtesy.
If you’re looking for something for a younger student, check out this post→
from Joanne
Loves Science or these
recommendations→ from STEM
Friday. By the way, I also write
about engineering, infrastructure and the environment at Infrastructure Watch.
Google
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)