Ambrose, Stephen E. Undaunted Courage: Meriwether Lewis, Thomas Jefferson, and the Opening of the American West. 1996. New York: Touchstone, 1997.
Undaunted Courage is a biography of Meriwether Lewis. It is also, to a large extent, an account of Lewis’ expedition, co-led by William Clark, up the Missouri River, across the Rocky Mountains, down the Columbia River to the Pacific Coast and back again.
The Lewis and Clark expedition, the bicentennial of which was celebrated in 2004 through 2006, is rightly presented as the centerpiece of Lewis’ life. Ambrose shows how Lewis’ early life in the plantations and wilderness of Virginia, as a militia officer during the Whiskey Rebellion and under the political tutelage of Thomas Jefferson uniquely prepared Lewis to lead a company of explorer-soldiers with a broad mission. His life after the expedition was brief and troubled.
The western exploration, beginning in 1804 and ending in 1806, is the major focus of the narrative. It was more than simply a trip. Lewis and Clark were charged with scientific observation (particularly geography, botany and zoology), Indian diplomacy, establishing trade, and what might be considered a touch of espionage. With the exception of Indian policy, Lewis, Clark and their men performed admirably.
Lewis, throughout the mission and afterward, wanted to make it clear that he and Clark had equal parts in the leadership of the expedition. It is extraordinary that this worked so well. One gets the impression for the book that Lewis was the senior of these equals, which may explain it. Even so, Lewis seemed to prefer the close companionship of trusted peers and friends.
Lewis achieved great success while still relatively young, in his early thirties. Early success can be tough, but Lewis seems like a man who can handle tough situations. However, his few years of life after the expedition seem to be characterized by failure. Certainly, the political situation in the Louisiana Territory, where Lewis was appointed governor, was very difficult, and he may not have been cut out to be a politician and bureaucrat. However, he left important matters that were easily within his grasp undone. Notably, he never published the expedition journals, which more than anything else may have sealed his fame, supported his policies and multiplied the fruit of his exceptional labor.
The final years of Lewis’ life, which ended in suicide, raises many unanswered, and possibly unanswerable, questions. Even so, Ambrose’s biography of the man is an interesting story, and sometime and exciting tale of his great adventure.
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Indian. Sort by date Show all posts
Showing posts sorted by relevance for query Indian. Sort by date Show all posts
Saturday, October 4, 2008
Sunday, July 10, 2016
The Imperial Cruise by James Bradley
In 1905,
then Secretary of War William Taft
and a host of other American
dignitaries took a tour of Pacific islands
and Asian
nations. James
Bradley tells the story of this trip, along with the wider contest of President Theodore
Roosevelt’s policies toward Pacific expansion and Asia, in The Imperial Cruise.
Roosevelt, with Taft as his right hand, engaged in secret diplomacy with
Japan. The
Senate would not have approved a treaty with Japan with terms Roosevelt wanted,
and his own State Department would have strongly advised against his course. So
Roosevelt sent Taft to consummate a secret deal that he could never
acknowledge.
By the time Taft set sail, Japan was already responding to interactions
with the West. It was remaking itself into an industrialized, militarized country
in the western mold. Roosevelt saw in them American-friendly, quasi-civilized
people who could expand Anglo-Saxon virtues into Asia without slipping out from
under Anglo-American influence. As with almost everything related to the
Pacific and Asian peoples, Roosevelt was very shortsighted.
In reading about the early 20th
Century, I’ve been struck by the pervasiveness of racism. Bradley
explains how Roosevelt viewed everything through a racial lens. These were
racial lenses were proudly worn by white elites at the time. The key to history
was racial history. They saw the birth of civilization in the Middle East
with the Aryans, who began moving west. Around the Mediterranean,
where the Aryans mixed with other races, civilizations degenerated. In Germany, pure
Aryans gave rise to Teutons, who inherited Aryan civilizing with values of democracy and
individualism. These Teutons moved west and were further perfected in the
Anglo-Saxons. Anglo-Saxon civilization leapt across the Atlantic and push aside
the savages of North America.
To Roosevelt, Manifest Destiny had not closed with the conquering of the
continent; it was ready to spread into the Pacific. White men would continue to
spread their civilizing influence, subjugating or exterminating lesser, browner
races when necessary as white Americans had done to their Indian
wards. White elites like Roosevelt saw their westward destiny in this racial
history, and it was further confirm by science in Darwinian
survival of the fittest.
History
and science
refute such notions now. Bradley (and I) certainly don’t try to justify the
attitudes or actions of Roosevelt, Taft or others. Bradley is plainly critical
of handling of Pacific islands and Asia. Roosevelt’s racial views blinded him
to the abilities and patriotism of non-whites. He had the hubris to pursue
diplomacy on his own, secretly, without advice from the State Department,
Senate or anyone else who might raise the slightest objection or concern. He
tutored Japan in the ways of western imperialism, but could not imagine how
well they would learn the lessons. Bradley places at least some of the blame
for World
War II in the Pacific at the feet of Roosevelt, whose interventions created
the powerful military
empire we faced in those waters.
Roosevelt was an astute manager of his image and he understood public
relations. Because of this, he sent his oldest (and nearly estranged) daughter Alice on
the trip. She was a celebrity, and her presence assured a lot of press
coverage. Her presence was also a distraction from Taft’s secret mission.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in
Bradley, James. The Imperial
Cruise: A Secret History of Empire and War. New York: Little,
Brown and Company, 2009.
Friday, July 24, 2009
1089 and All That by David Acheson
Acheson, David. 1089 and All That: A Journey into Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press, 2002.
1089 and All That starts with a little mathematical magic trick. Take any three-digit number in which the first and last numbers differ by at least two (like 553). Reverse it and subtract the numbers (553-355=198). Take this new number and add it to its reverse (198+891=1089). The answer will be 1098 for any three-digit number you pick.
This little trick attracted David Acheson to math as a boy. In his book, he tries to convey some of the wonder, fascination and surprise of mathematics.
A deep understanding of math isn’t necessary to follow the book. Someone who made through high school algebra can follow most of the math fairly easily. Acheson delves into deep waters (geometry, calculus and differential equations), but he doesn’t pile on the equations or expect readers to solve them. He gives the reader enough explanation to follow the basic logic and grasp the proof. The payoff is the unexpected results.
A wide amount of math is covered in this fairly short book, from those areas already mentioned to chaos theory. Much of it is applied math, dealing with mechanical systems, planetary motion and weather prediction.
Acheson is a practicing mathematician and one of the most interesting parts of the book deals with one of his own developments. He lays the foundation throughout the book and casually leads to a chapter in which he turns things upside-down with his take on the Indian rope trick. This has a big gee-whiz factor and itself makes the book worth reading.
Acheson wraps up by returning to something like the magic trick he uses to open the book. In different chapters he introduces some prominent numbers in math: π, e and i. Though they don’t relate to a trick, but they have a mysterious connection that seems even more fascinating.
1089 and All That starts with a little mathematical magic trick. Take any three-digit number in which the first and last numbers differ by at least two (like 553). Reverse it and subtract the numbers (553-355=198). Take this new number and add it to its reverse (198+891=1089). The answer will be 1098 for any three-digit number you pick.
This little trick attracted David Acheson to math as a boy. In his book, he tries to convey some of the wonder, fascination and surprise of mathematics.
A deep understanding of math isn’t necessary to follow the book. Someone who made through high school algebra can follow most of the math fairly easily. Acheson delves into deep waters (geometry, calculus and differential equations), but he doesn’t pile on the equations or expect readers to solve them. He gives the reader enough explanation to follow the basic logic and grasp the proof. The payoff is the unexpected results.
A wide amount of math is covered in this fairly short book, from those areas already mentioned to chaos theory. Much of it is applied math, dealing with mechanical systems, planetary motion and weather prediction.
Acheson is a practicing mathematician and one of the most interesting parts of the book deals with one of his own developments. He lays the foundation throughout the book and casually leads to a chapter in which he turns things upside-down with his take on the Indian rope trick. This has a big gee-whiz factor and itself makes the book worth reading.
Acheson wraps up by returning to something like the magic trick he uses to open the book. In different chapters he introduces some prominent numbers in math: π, e and i. Though they don’t relate to a trick, but they have a mysterious connection that seems even more fascinating.
Tuesday, January 8, 2013
Arthur & George by Julian Barnes
I was going read only fiction over
the holidays
and give myself a break from writing reviews.
So I picked up Arthur & George
by Julian
Barnes. I remembered I reviewed The Sherlockian by Graham Moore and
began to feel obligated to review this other novel about Arthur
Conan Doyle as well.
Google
The books are very different. The Sherlockian is a thriller
and it is entirely fictional. Barnes’
book is a more literary,
historical
novel based on real events. If he had
been writing a thriller, the story would have started when Doyle got involved
in overturning the wrongful conviction of solicitor George Adelji
for mutilating and killing animals
in the rural community where he was raised by a Scottish mother
and an Indian
father who converted to Anglicanism and
served as a vicar. This doesn’t occur
until you’ve already read 70 percent of the book. Barnes doesn’t indulge the achronologic order
a novel permits, but he does take his time, gets into the heads of his
protagonists, and takes a long look at side stories. This is why I refer to it as a literary novel
in contrast to a thriller, which is more to-the-point and plot driven.
I wonder why Barnes decided to write a novel instead of a nonfiction
account of the events. I suspect there
was plenty of source material. Doyle was
a prolific writer. Newspapers
abounded in England
at the time. Clues to the truth can be
found in even the most obfuscatory court and government
documents. The Adelji case led to new laws, including
the introduction of appeals courts to the British criminal
justice system. I suspect he wanted to
explore themes that interested him without too strictly bound to a factual
narrative.
There is the suggestion of a theme in the opening chapters. Doyle and Adelji are introduced through their
childhood exposures to death, something
that would have been common in the 1800s. Doyle famously became a spiritualist. He was committed to the idea that death was
passage into another life and that gifted people could communicate with the
departed. I do not know if Adelji’s
views are on the record, but Barnes depicts him as something between neutral and
skeptical. He also seems indifferent and
uncurious. The only fact he is sure of
is that everyone dies. What happens
after death, if anything, is unknown, and he finds the evidence of an afterlife
to be weak. These views are not
contrasted; they are juxtaposed.
Ethics
may be another theme. Doyle derived his
ethical view from his notions of chivalry. Adelji, who comes across as a
high-functioning person with Asperger’s
syndrome, found his place in the order and logic of the law. There was plenty of unethical activity, or at
least human venality, presented in the story: racism, eugenic notions,
sloppy police work, unjust courts, and heel-dragging bureaucrats.
I might have preferred a straight nonfiction account of the
events. Barnes novelization worked for
me, though. It was certainly more
effective than the partial fictionalization attempted by David
Gelernter in his history
of the 1939 World’s Fair.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in
Thursday, August 20, 2009
When the Rivers Run Dry by Fred Pearce
I originally posted this review at Infrastructure Watch, where I write about infrastructure and the environment.
Pearce, Fred. When the Rivers Run Dry: Water—The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-first Century. Boston: Beacon, 2006.
Mankind’s attempts to harness rivers have had unintended consequences. Schemes to make land more productive have created deserts. Crops on drained land have produced less food and value than the swamps they displaced. Rivers hemmed in to prevent flooding have flooded more frequently and worse than before.
Pearce isn’t against technology. He sometimes expresses admiration for the dams, canals and other engineering feats about which he writes. However, he’s not impressed when this technology deprives people of the water and wealth it was intended to provide.
Water and wealth is a connection Pearce often makes. For all the lip service paid to the social benefits of grand water schemes, the water tends to go where the money is.
Overall, the world has become more water poor. The poorest have generally lost the most.
In spite of the history, Peace sees hope in the potential of technology that works with the water cycle instead of against it. It is already happening on a small scale where ancient where people are reviving ancient methods of capturing rainwater. Indian farmers are adapting dessert containers for use as a cheap, and more efficient, drip irrigation pipe. On the large scale, river engineers are cutting levees, restoring wetlands and allow river to return to curvy courses. In agriculture, the biggest user and waster of water in much of the world, there is a move to crops that are more appropriate to the locally available rainfall and less dependent on irrigation. Even in Los Angeles, a city known for the lengths it has gone to in order to quench its great thirst in a dry land, activist are seeking to create a more porous city that captures and uses the water that falls there naturally.
To illustrate his points, Pearce travels the world to see the disastrous results of bad water management, the extreme example being the disappearing Aral Sea. He also points out what works, like a restored qanat in Iraq.
You can order this book here.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in Water by Marq de Villiers.
Pearce, Fred. When the Rivers Run Dry: Water—The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-first Century. Boston: Beacon, 2006.
Mankind’s attempts to harness rivers have had unintended consequences. Schemes to make land more productive have created deserts. Crops on drained land have produced less food and value than the swamps they displaced. Rivers hemmed in to prevent flooding have flooded more frequently and worse than before.
Pearce isn’t against technology. He sometimes expresses admiration for the dams, canals and other engineering feats about which he writes. However, he’s not impressed when this technology deprives people of the water and wealth it was intended to provide.
Water and wealth is a connection Pearce often makes. For all the lip service paid to the social benefits of grand water schemes, the water tends to go where the money is.
Overall, the world has become more water poor. The poorest have generally lost the most.
In spite of the history, Peace sees hope in the potential of technology that works with the water cycle instead of against it. It is already happening on a small scale where ancient where people are reviving ancient methods of capturing rainwater. Indian farmers are adapting dessert containers for use as a cheap, and more efficient, drip irrigation pipe. On the large scale, river engineers are cutting levees, restoring wetlands and allow river to return to curvy courses. In agriculture, the biggest user and waster of water in much of the world, there is a move to crops that are more appropriate to the locally available rainfall and less dependent on irrigation. Even in Los Angeles, a city known for the lengths it has gone to in order to quench its great thirst in a dry land, activist are seeking to create a more porous city that captures and uses the water that falls there naturally.
To illustrate his points, Pearce travels the world to see the disastrous results of bad water management, the extreme example being the disappearing Aral Sea. He also points out what works, like a restored qanat in Iraq.
You can order this book here.
If you’re interested in this book, you may also be interested in Water by Marq de Villiers.
Sunday, April 17, 2016
The Real World of Sherlock Holmes by Peter Costello
Readers of Sherlock
Holmes stories may recall that the detective clipped
stories from newspapers
related to crimes,
or unusual stories in which Holmes detected the hint of a crime. Holmes’
creator, Arthur
Conan Doyle, did the same thing, and he had a collection of books related
to crime. This is just one aspect of himself that Doyle put into the fictional
detective.
Doyle’s interest in crime, and particularly in defending those he felt
were unjustly prosecuted, sometimes led him into investigating crimes. Peter
Costello describes some of these crimes and investigations in The Real World of Sherlock Holmes.
Perhaps the most celebrated case, and the case in which Doyle conducted
himself as a Holmes-like detective, was the case of George Edalji.
Edalji, a solicitor born to an Indian father
and English mother,
was convicted of a series of animal mutilations. Doyle believed the case
against him was week, based mainly on poison-pen letters accusing the young
man. As he began to investigate, he found sloppy investigative techniques,
openly racist
police leadership,
an incompetent counsel
contributed to the wrongful conviction. Doyle investigated further and even
collected evidence indicating that someone else was the culprit. Through his
investigation, along with pressure he brought through the media and influential
acquaintances, he won a pardon for Edalji.
When Doyle became so deeply involved in a case, he was usually
motivated to correct what he saw as a miscarriage of justice. He was not so
active in his investigation of other crimes. Doyle studied crimes he found
interesting. More often than not, these were inquiries at a distance as he read
books and newspaper accounts, and discussed crimes with other interested
people. He was even a member of “Our Society,” a secretive crime club that
discussed the details of crime and developments in criminology in its
after-dinner meetings. Some of the members were lawyers and forensic scientists
(still a new profession) who were actively involved in investigating or
prosecuting crimes.
Costello suggests that some of these crimes inspired Doyle’s stories.
It makes sense that they would. Doyle always made significant changes when he
adapted a true
crime to a fictional
story, so no Sherlock Holmes story could be described as a close, though
fictionalized, recreation of a true crime.
Doyle remained interested in crime throughout his life, but by the 1920s he was
focused on promoting spiritualism.
Even when he investigated a crime in this era, it was usually because of an
element of spiritualism touching the case. He encouraged the use of
clairvoyants and mediums by the police. When Agatha
Christie disappeared, his investigation consisted of a consultation with
medium Horace
Leaf. (Journalists, passing on clairvoyance to use more Holmes-like
detection, found Christie staying at a resort under an assumed name.)
If you’re interested in this book, you may also interested in
Costello, Peter. The Real World
of Sherlock Holmes: The True Crimes Investigated by Arthur Conan Doyle. New York: Carrol &
Graf, 1991.
Thursday, February 16, 2012
Mayflower by Nathaniel Philbrick
Philbrick, Nathaniel. Mayflower: A Story of Courage, Community, and War. New York: Viking, 2006.
In Mayflower, Nathaniel Philbrick writes about the Plymouth Colony from the Pilgrim’s flight from Europe to the end of King Philip’s War. It is mainly a story of how the settler’s and their descendants related to the natives.
It was by no means certain that the Pilgrims would get along with the Indians. They were chiefly concerned with building a community on their religious convictions, strong beliefs they held on to in spite of persecution in England. In the New World, they would do things their way.
Even so, they were surprisingly humble. The hardships they faced in America were enough to humble anyone. They quickly realized their dependence on the sufferance of the native populations. Unwittingly, they had upset the political balance of the Indian tribes.
Massasoit was the leader of a tribe that was weakened by disease and other setbacks. Once one of the leading tribes in the regions, the Pokanokets were in danger of being subdued by their rivals. Massasoit, their sachem, built and alliance with the Pilgrims at Plymouth that kept him in a strong position.
This is only the beginning of the political intrigues that run through the history of the Plymouth colony. Many native leaders and would-be sachems used the English, their technology, and the fear many Indians felt to carve out a place for themselves in the dangerous world of inter-tribal politics.
Against this backdrop, the Pilgrims cultivated allies amongst the Indians. Though their desire for religious purity may caused them to separate themselves from the churches in England may have tended to isolate them, the discipline, self-control, humility, and justice required by their faith made them more palatable to the natives than other European settlers.
Things changed quickly within a couple of generations. The Pilgrims were chiefly interested in their religious community, but their immediate descendants were interested in land and the wealth it brought. This inevitably led to competition for resources. The Indians became resentful and the English shed humility as they gained power.
Massasoit’s grandson, Philip, doesn’t seem like a fighter. In fact, he was generally a runner. Even so, he was the spark that set ablaze a war in New England. The sachems before him sold much land to the settlers and Philip found himself without the resources to support his people. He strung things along for a while using threats and capitulations to get what he needed from the English, much like today’s small nuclear states do to the Western countries on a global scale. Plymouth officials became too high-handed with Philip and soon events and the resentments of his young warriors pushed the sachem into war.
The action of the war chapters makes them more interesting reading, but they tell an awful tale. The English killed, enslaved or displace half the native population of southern New England. The land they coveted was theirs for the taking, though Plymouth was so indebted after the war, it couldn’t afford the expansion.
The expulsion of Indians made the frontiers more dangerous. Friendly natives had once buffered the settlers from hostile tribes. Now a settler clearing the frontier was likely to be surrounded by hostile tribes and have no hope of help if they decided to purge foreigners.
As the United States expanded, the Pilgrims and King Philip’s War became lost history outside of New England. When they were brought back to popular knowledge, it was as stories transformed to be suitable for new times. Philbrick puts aside the romanticized tale of Thanksgiving not to debunk it, but to present the Pilgrims and Indians more as they were.
Nathanial Philbrick also wrote
Sea of Glory
If you’re interested in this book, you may might like
Undaunted Courage by Stephen Ambrose
Google
In Mayflower, Nathaniel Philbrick writes about the Plymouth Colony from the Pilgrim’s flight from Europe to the end of King Philip’s War. It is mainly a story of how the settler’s and their descendants related to the natives.
It was by no means certain that the Pilgrims would get along with the Indians. They were chiefly concerned with building a community on their religious convictions, strong beliefs they held on to in spite of persecution in England. In the New World, they would do things their way.
Even so, they were surprisingly humble. The hardships they faced in America were enough to humble anyone. They quickly realized their dependence on the sufferance of the native populations. Unwittingly, they had upset the political balance of the Indian tribes.
Massasoit was the leader of a tribe that was weakened by disease and other setbacks. Once one of the leading tribes in the regions, the Pokanokets were in danger of being subdued by their rivals. Massasoit, their sachem, built and alliance with the Pilgrims at Plymouth that kept him in a strong position.
This is only the beginning of the political intrigues that run through the history of the Plymouth colony. Many native leaders and would-be sachems used the English, their technology, and the fear many Indians felt to carve out a place for themselves in the dangerous world of inter-tribal politics.
Against this backdrop, the Pilgrims cultivated allies amongst the Indians. Though their desire for religious purity may caused them to separate themselves from the churches in England may have tended to isolate them, the discipline, self-control, humility, and justice required by their faith made them more palatable to the natives than other European settlers.
Things changed quickly within a couple of generations. The Pilgrims were chiefly interested in their religious community, but their immediate descendants were interested in land and the wealth it brought. This inevitably led to competition for resources. The Indians became resentful and the English shed humility as they gained power.
Massasoit’s grandson, Philip, doesn’t seem like a fighter. In fact, he was generally a runner. Even so, he was the spark that set ablaze a war in New England. The sachems before him sold much land to the settlers and Philip found himself without the resources to support his people. He strung things along for a while using threats and capitulations to get what he needed from the English, much like today’s small nuclear states do to the Western countries on a global scale. Plymouth officials became too high-handed with Philip and soon events and the resentments of his young warriors pushed the sachem into war.
The action of the war chapters makes them more interesting reading, but they tell an awful tale. The English killed, enslaved or displace half the native population of southern New England. The land they coveted was theirs for the taking, though Plymouth was so indebted after the war, it couldn’t afford the expansion.
The expulsion of Indians made the frontiers more dangerous. Friendly natives had once buffered the settlers from hostile tribes. Now a settler clearing the frontier was likely to be surrounded by hostile tribes and have no hope of help if they decided to purge foreigners.
As the United States expanded, the Pilgrims and King Philip’s War became lost history outside of New England. When they were brought back to popular knowledge, it was as stories transformed to be suitable for new times. Philbrick puts aside the romanticized tale of Thanksgiving not to debunk it, but to present the Pilgrims and Indians more as they were.
Nathanial Philbrick also wrote
Sea of Glory
If you’re interested in this book, you may might like
Undaunted Courage by Stephen Ambrose
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)