Readers of Sherlock
Holmes stories may recall that the detective clipped
stories from newspapers
related to crimes,
or unusual stories in which Holmes detected the hint of a crime. Holmes’
creator, Arthur
Conan Doyle, did the same thing, and he had a collection of books related
to crime. This is just one aspect of himself that Doyle put into the fictional
detective.
Doyle’s interest in crime, and particularly in defending those he felt
were unjustly prosecuted, sometimes led him into investigating crimes. Peter
Costello describes some of these crimes and investigations in The Real World of Sherlock Holmes.
Perhaps the most celebrated case, and the case in which Doyle conducted
himself as a Holmes-like detective, was the case of George Edalji.
Edalji, a solicitor born to an Indian father
and English mother,
was convicted of a series of animal mutilations. Doyle believed the case
against him was week, based mainly on poison-pen letters accusing the young
man. As he began to investigate, he found sloppy investigative techniques,
openly racist
police leadership,
an incompetent counsel
contributed to the wrongful conviction. Doyle investigated further and even
collected evidence indicating that someone else was the culprit. Through his
investigation, along with pressure he brought through the media and influential
acquaintances, he won a pardon for Edalji.
When Doyle became so deeply involved in a case, he was usually
motivated to correct what he saw as a miscarriage of justice. He was not so
active in his investigation of other crimes. Doyle studied crimes he found
interesting. More often than not, these were inquiries at a distance as he read
books and newspaper accounts, and discussed crimes with other interested
people. He was even a member of “Our Society,” a secretive crime club that
discussed the details of crime and developments in criminology in its
after-dinner meetings. Some of the members were lawyers and forensic scientists
(still a new profession) who were actively involved in investigating or
prosecuting crimes.
Costello suggests that some of these crimes inspired Doyle’s stories.
It makes sense that they would. Doyle always made significant changes when he
adapted a true
crime to a fictional
story, so no Sherlock Holmes story could be described as a close, though
fictionalized, recreation of a true crime.
Doyle remained interested in crime throughout his life, but by the 1920s he was
focused on promoting spiritualism.
Even when he investigated a crime in this era, it was usually because of an
element of spiritualism touching the case. He encouraged the use of
clairvoyants and mediums by the police. When Agatha
Christie disappeared, his investigation consisted of a consultation with
medium Horace
Leaf. (Journalists, passing on clairvoyance to use more Holmes-like
detection, found Christie staying at a resort under an assumed name.)
If you’re interested in this book, you may also interested in
Costello, Peter. The Real World
of Sherlock Holmes: The True Crimes Investigated by Arthur Conan Doyle. New York: Carrol &
Graf, 1991.
No comments:
Post a Comment